Letters

By

Comments

sindhukk said…
Thanking you so much for this great information. You did wonderful work.SarkariResults
September 20, 2016 at 3:58 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THW completely ban smoking.

By
Image
Motion :- THW completely ban smoking. House :- Western Liberal Democracies. Opposition Case: [Courtesy - Vishakha Wijenayake ] Each and every individual has a right to decide those matters that are most intimately connected one’s well-being, including the duration and quality of one’s life and the circumstances of one’s death. According to this view, the right to smoke, or engage in any kind of self harm stems from a deeper right to self-determination, a right to shape the circumstances of our lives so long as we do not harm or imperil others. The State as an external party lacks sufficient knowledge of an individual’s own chosen structure of values and preferences to make an informed decision to coerce an individual to comply with the values of the Government. An influence can be categorized as undue only in circumstances where it is deceptive, and where it is aggressive to the extent that it blocks out contradictory sources of information, making it impossible for an individual
Read more

INDC 2013 Prize Money

By
The Prize Money structure for INDC 2013: The Indian National Debate Champions walk away with a cool INR 45,000 , whereas the runners up bag INR 30,000 . Furthermore, we will have a 'Best Adjudication Institution' award with a cash prize of INR 15,000 (to be used for defraying travel costs of adjudicators from the winning institution; while adjudicating at future tournaments).
Read more

Tournament Review - IIT Bombay Mood Indigo Intervarsity 2014.

By
Touted as the warm-up to the WUDCs in Chennai, the IIT Bombay Parliamentary Debate turned out to be a mixed experience for most participants. This review is written on the basis of the data collected via feedback forms given out to debaters after the tournament, and aims to reflect their opinions. Quality of Teams - 5/5 This was a no brainer. With quality participation from most debating institutions in the country, competition in the tournament was excellent. The presence of multiple international participants as competitive debaters added to the “Pre-WUDC” image of the tournament, and ensured the out rounds were high quality match ups. Quality of Adjudicators - 4.3 /5 Multiple subsidised adjudicators from across the world ensured good decision making in most rounds. A high quality core meant debaters were largely satisfied with the feedback and constructive, and had lots to learn. The internal adj pool however, did not match the tournament standards. Some debaters believed
Read more