INDC 2013 Wild Card Seeding

By -

We are as of 1133 hrs, 30/03/2013; commencing the seeding process for the 2 WILD CARD slots at the Indian National Debate Championship.

 Here are the details of the process:

 1) The slots are for institutional teams. However teams from institutions that have already been seeded are not eligible.

 2) The seeding of these 2 slots will be done on the basis of evaluating the team and not the institution as a whole.

 3) In order to apply for these slots, mail us your Team CV at indc@debatersdiary.com

 4) The Team CV shall comprise of the following;
-Names of the speakers and their institution(Again, all three need to be from the same institution).
-Individual debating achievements of the speakers, including cross team achievements and best speaker prizes.

 5) The deadline for this process is midnight, 4th April 2013.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THW completely ban smoking.

By -
Image
Motion :- THW completely ban smoking. House :- Western Liberal Democracies. Opposition Case: [Courtesy - Vishakha Wijenayake ] Each and every individual has a right to decide those matters that are most intimately connected one’s well-being, including the duration and quality of one’s life and the circumstances of one’s death. According to this view, the right to smoke, or engage in any kind of self harm stems from a deeper right to self-determination, a right to shape the circumstances of our lives so long as we do not harm or imperil others. The State as an external party lacks sufficient knowledge of an individual’s own chosen structure of values and preferences to make an informed decision to coerce an individual to comply with the values of the Government. An influence can be categorized as undue only in circumstances where it is deceptive, and where it is aggressive to the extent that it blocks out contradictory sources of information, making it impossible for an individual
Read more

Tournament Review - IIT Bombay Mood Indigo Intervarsity 2014.

By -
Touted as the warm-up to the WUDCs in Chennai, the IIT Bombay Parliamentary Debate turned out to be a mixed experience for most participants. This review is written on the basis of the data collected via feedback forms given out to debaters after the tournament, and aims to reflect their opinions. Quality of Teams - 5/5 This was a no brainer. With quality participation from most debating institutions in the country, competition in the tournament was excellent. The presence of multiple international participants as competitive debaters added to the “Pre-WUDC” image of the tournament, and ensured the out rounds were high quality match ups. Quality of Adjudicators - 4.3 /5 Multiple subsidised adjudicators from across the world ensured good decision making in most rounds. A high quality core meant debaters were largely satisfied with the feedback and constructive, and had lots to learn. The internal adj pool however, did not match the tournament standards. Some debaters believed
Read more

The Case of Speluncean Explorers (In a nutshell)

By -
Image
HYPOTHETICAL: THE CASE OF THE SPELUNCEAN EXPLORERS FACTS: Five cave explorers got trapped underground, whilst on an expedition, following the collapse of a cave wall. Any scope of rescue was at least 10 days away and the last radio transmission received by them was from a doctor (following which the radio; their only means of communicating with the outside world ran out of battery), conveyed to them that the only manner in which they could survive till the arrival of the rescue team would be if they were to consume one of their own, given that they had run out of food and water supplies. One of the explorers, Whetmore, suggested that they throw dice to determine (i.e. random probability) who amongst them should be the sacrifice. This was held as reasonable by everyone after which, they all agreed to follow through with the plan of action. However, just before the dice was thrown, Whetmore backed out of the agreement. He was outvoted, and a dice was thrown on his behalf.
Read more