Rating           What it means {Unless Specified otherwise}
*****             Tournament has been paying up in full over the years and doing so promptly.
****               Paid up late, but delivered on the promised amount.
***                 Paid up extremely late and after a lot of badgering and/or paid a reduced amount.
**                  Paid up late and then too a significantly reduced amount from what was declared prior to the tournament.
*                     Never paid up. Hang em.

Note: This rating is no reflection on the scale of prize money, just the promptness with which it is doled out.

TOURNAMENT (Alphabetically):

AIL Mohali [5]
BITS - QED [4]
Christ [5]
CNLU [4]
Hansraj [?]
Hindu -Premchand [5 over the years, 1 for the last edition]
IIT Bombay [3.5] {IITBDSM takes chilling very seriously, they like taking their time}
IIT Guwahati [5]
IP [5]
Jindal Debate [5]
JMC [?]
KMC [4.5]
Loyola [2]
LSR [1.5]
MS Ramiah [5]
NLS [3.5] {Tendency to inflate prize money projections, reports of delays in payments this year}
NLUD [5]
NUJS [<Your caption here*>]
PEC -Trivium [5]
Ramjas - Polemic [5 over the years, 3 for the last edition]
RVDT  [4]
SPIT [?]
SRCC [4]
Stephen's - Muk Mem [4 over the years, 2 for the last edition] {Late payment, no official figures given prior to the tournament, informally communicated figures not met with}
St. Xavier's Bombay [5]
Venky -People Speak [5]
VIT - ProCon [4]

*Best one gets INR 750** from the editor.

**Collect amount from Prasun Bhaiya.

Dear Debaters,

Our database thrives on your feedback. Join the discourse at


Unknown said…
The stuff in this blog is in not only incredible but also providing the great knowledge to the people.
why is credit important

Popular posts from this blog

The Case of Speluncean Explorers (In a nutshell)

Tournament Review - IIT Bombay Mood Indigo Intervarsity 2014.

Delhi State Assembly Elections, 2013: The Whole Story