The RV Debating Tournament 2011

By -

RVDT 2011 Pre Invite:


Dear All,

The Debating Year 2011-12 needs to be kick started with a bang. To do the honors, the RV Debating Tournament is back.

RVDT 2010-11 saw 50 teams compete for the gargantuan Championship Trophy and the not so inconsequential amount of 1,50,000 INR in bounty. Our prize money set to grow to even greater heights this year and we are continuing what we pioneered – at RVDT, if You Break, You Make!

At RV, we value the importance of quality adjudication more than any other tournament and handsomely reward the 5 Best Adjudicators. We are inviting the top Adjudicators from the Debating Circuits around the world and assure you that RVDT 2011 is set to break ANY of your wildest expectations.

RVDT has always been about unrivalled quality; about Grand Opening Nights at some of the finest hotels in town, about the most competitive debaters and debates that make for stuff of legends, about hospitality so generous that nothing gets in the way of your mood to debate. It has been about our Break Night Parties at the dowdiest resorts Bangalore has to offer, where the merry making and flowing rivers of the good stuff brought tears to the eyes of revelers (some of them at least).

Our Tournament has always been about creating legends. Our legendary “Bakchodh (BC) Award” has always provided for unparalleled amounts of entertainment at the cost of aspirants. Get ready for a treat in the Asian Style of debating where the principled motions are known to chase squirrels up trees.

The dates we are tentatively looking at, is the weekend between 23rd to 27th of September. Give us feedback regarding the compatibility of these dates with your calendar. We have set the tentative team cap to 60 with the N1 criterion regarding adjudicators.

We shall soon be sending out a communication containing details regarding the Registration Process, the Formal Invite, Details about the Subsidy Process and further specifics regarding the tournament. We have a role blind subsidy policy. Subsidies will be given out to ensure that we can give you the greatest tournament we possibly can.

We at the RV Debating Society subscribe to the highest strata of debating whoredom- and this desire, persistence, and a general lack of better things to do- will ensure that your tournament will be one you can’t easily forget.

Feel free to call upon us, as we will be ready to help you with any issue, debating or otherwise.

Contact:

Sayan Sanyal (+91 8095264269)

Tournament Director

Mayukh Samanta (+91 9980845274)

Joint Tournament Director


Email: info.rvdt@gmail.com

Follow us on Facebook.


Or check out our web page.


Regards,

Executive Organizing Committee,

The RV Debating Tournament 2011.

[RVCE Debate Society,

RV College of Engineering,

Bangalore, India.]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THW completely ban smoking.

By -
Image
Motion :- THW completely ban smoking. House :- Western Liberal Democracies. Opposition Case: [Courtesy - Vishakha Wijenayake ] Each and every individual has a right to decide those matters that are most intimately connected one’s well-being, including the duration and quality of one’s life and the circumstances of one’s death. According to this view, the right to smoke, or engage in any kind of self harm stems from a deeper right to self-determination, a right to shape the circumstances of our lives so long as we do not harm or imperil others. The State as an external party lacks sufficient knowledge of an individual’s own chosen structure of values and preferences to make an informed decision to coerce an individual to comply with the values of the Government. An influence can be categorized as undue only in circumstances where it is deceptive, and where it is aggressive to the extent that it blocks out contradictory sources of information, making it impossible for an individual
Read more

Tournament Review - IIT Bombay Mood Indigo Intervarsity 2014.

By -
Touted as the warm-up to the WUDCs in Chennai, the IIT Bombay Parliamentary Debate turned out to be a mixed experience for most participants. This review is written on the basis of the data collected via feedback forms given out to debaters after the tournament, and aims to reflect their opinions. Quality of Teams - 5/5 This was a no brainer. With quality participation from most debating institutions in the country, competition in the tournament was excellent. The presence of multiple international participants as competitive debaters added to the “Pre-WUDC” image of the tournament, and ensured the out rounds were high quality match ups. Quality of Adjudicators - 4.3 /5 Multiple subsidised adjudicators from across the world ensured good decision making in most rounds. A high quality core meant debaters were largely satisfied with the feedback and constructive, and had lots to learn. The internal adj pool however, did not match the tournament standards. Some debaters believed
Read more

The Case of Speluncean Explorers (In a nutshell)

By -
Image
HYPOTHETICAL: THE CASE OF THE SPELUNCEAN EXPLORERS FACTS: Five cave explorers got trapped underground, whilst on an expedition, following the collapse of a cave wall. Any scope of rescue was at least 10 days away and the last radio transmission received by them was from a doctor (following which the radio; their only means of communicating with the outside world ran out of battery), conveyed to them that the only manner in which they could survive till the arrival of the rescue team would be if they were to consume one of their own, given that they had run out of food and water supplies. One of the explorers, Whetmore, suggested that they throw dice to determine (i.e. random probability) who amongst them should be the sacrifice. This was held as reasonable by everyone after which, they all agreed to follow through with the plan of action. However, just before the dice was thrown, Whetmore backed out of the agreement. He was outvoted, and a dice was thrown on his behalf.
Read more