Touted as the warm-up to the WUDCs in Chennai, the IIT Bombay Parliamentary Debate turned out to be a mixed experience for most participants. This review is written on the basis of the data collected via feedback forms given out to debaters after the tournament, and aims to reflect their opinions. Quality of Teams - 5/5 This was a no brainer. With quality participation from most debating institutions in the country, competition in the tournament was excellent. The presence of multiple international participants as competitive debaters added to the “Pre-WUDC” image of the tournament, and ensured the out rounds were high quality match ups. Quality of Adjudicators - 4.3 /5 Multiple subsidised adjudicators from across the world ensured good decision making in most rounds. A high quality core meant debaters were largely satisfied with the feedback and constructive, and had lots to learn. The internal adj pool however, did not match the tournament standards. Some debaters believed
Popular posts from this blog
HYPOTHETICAL: THE CASE OF THE SPELUNCEAN EXPLORERS FACTS: Five cave explorers got trapped underground, whilst on an expedition, following the collapse of a cave wall. Any scope of rescue was at least 10 days away and the last radio transmission received by them was from a doctor (following which the radio; their only means of communicating with the outside world ran out of battery), conveyed to them that the only manner in which they could survive till the arrival of the rescue team would be if they were to consume one of their own, given that they had run out of food and water supplies. One of the explorers, Whetmore, suggested that they throw dice to determine (i.e. random probability) who amongst them should be the sacrifice. This was held as reasonable by everyone after which, they all agreed to follow through with the plan of action. However, just before the dice was thrown, Whetmore backed out of the agreement. He was outvoted, and a dice was thrown on his behalf.
Delhi State Assembly Elections, 2013: The Whole Story ~Aashay Sahay~ The average citizen of Delhi experiences a quality of life that is relatively better than most of the nation. A large portion of people living in Delhi have families in the neighbouring states and are therefore aware that the state of civic amenities available to them are definitely superior to what their relatives have access to. The citizens of this city see work going on all around them, cranes all over the city, the government is working. The Metro and bus services make their lives easier. Large scale urbanization gives them a sense of growth and progress. The citizen of Delhi feels at comfort with the way things are and has therefore kept the Sheila Dikshit led government in power. In the course of her three consecutive terms, Sheila Dikshit has been masterful at winning over vote banks with governmental initiatives targeted at the largest segment of the voter population in Delhi, the poor livi